The First Step in Planning Your Self-Service Investment
Planning your self-service investments means making decisions across multiple disciplines. USAN, in association with ContactBabel, has just published a nearly 200-page report on that topic—50 charts deep, covering all the critical topics that make up today’s self-service investment strategy. Those topics include transitioning to self-service, evaluating ROI, defining the costs and complexities of creating a self-service knowledge base—and more.
The report has a very straightforward starting point.
It divides all customer events into two buckets:
Any contact event where a dialog between people doesn’t have to take place is transactional. It’s where your customer wants to do something that involves one of your backend systems—make a payment, update account information, initiate a return. These are all actions that can be conducted directly between customer and database, with a front-end interface to guide the transaction. In cases like these, your live agent does little more than substitute for that front-end—a GUI with opposable thumbs. (Often, agent and customer are using the same system—they have exactly the same capability and authority to complete all the tasks.)
Here are some of the core identifying characteristics of transactional events:
One clear example of this kind of transactional event is password resets. Help desks report that 70% of their calls focus on password issues: the vast majority of those calls can be handled successfully with self-service.
Here, person-to-person dialog is required—because of circumstances, regulations, or the customer demands it. The task may be complex but it’s not just cost and complexity that fuels the investment; it’s customer satisfaction as well. No matter the cost, failing to provide the customer the assurance and peace of mind that only comes from talking to another person can damage your brand.
Here are some of the core identifying characteristics of interactional events:
The IRS comes to mind as an example. The cost of creating the secure, compliant self-service infrastructure to handle those complex events far exceeds the cost of having a live agent handle it.
So: two buckets. Easy, right? Simply put the transactional events in one bucket and the interactional events in a second bucket and you’ve nailed the first step.
Wrong. There’s a third bucket where all those customer events that don’t fall neatly into either of the other two land—and it often fills up fastest of all. It includes customer events that are sometimes transactional, sometimes interactional and sometimes almost both at once. This bucket customer events where the self-service investment and the live agent investment are both in play.
That’s the trickiest of the three.
And we’ll talk about it more fully next time.
Interested in learning more about the state of Customer Self-Service? Download ContactBabel’s Inner Circle Guide
Share This On: